Total — unique visitors
Browse by category Chatbots Image Generation Video Generation Audio & Voice Coding Writing Productivity Research AI Agents Free Tier Table
Home page ›Ask Cat on AI

Ask Cat › AI Tool Summary › PixVerse

[Verified] PixVerse Free Tier Hands Out 60 Daily Credits That Vanish Each Day—Paid Plans Start US$10

🐾 Key numbers
  • Free tier: There is
  • Cheapest paid plan: US$10/mo and up
  • Free quota: Second-hand information disclosure: the free-quota figures below are …
  • Last checked: 2026-09-24

Article last updated: 2026-09-23


PixVerse is an AI video generator that turns text or images into short clips—the kind of tool that could save a creator hours of editing. But pricing here has a twist: the official pricing page doesn’t exist on the public web. It lives inside the app, behind a login wall. And the free tier? You get 60 credits daily, but use them or lose them at midnight UTC.

This hidden-pricing setup shapes everything about buying here. You can’t comparison-shop before signing up. The tool gives you no third-party documentation to trust. And those daily expiring credits? They look generous until you realize you can’t bank them for a big project later. Let’s dig into what PixVerse actually costs and whether it’s worth the sign-up.

Where’s the official pricing page?

Visit pixverse.ai/pricing, pixverse.ai/en/pricing, app.pixverse.ai/pricing, or app.pixverse.ai/membership—all four paths return 404. The tool has no public pricing page at all. That’s not a bug; it’s intentional. PixVerse keeps all pricing locked inside the app. You sign up first, see prices later. This alone makes PixVerse an outlier: most video AI tools publish their tiers upfront.

The only official document we found was a PixVerse blog post confirming they give “free credits to registered users” but explicitly stating credits “can vary by account, region, and product route.” Translation: even the vendor won’t promise the same free allowance to everyone. You have to log in and check the app to know what you get.

How credits map to actual video

Before we talk cost, you need to understand the currency: credits. One credit buys one second of video generation.

A 30-second clip at 720p with no sound costs 270 credits (9 credits/second). The same clip with audio costs 360 credits (12 credits/second). At 1080p—which only paid tiers unlock—the math doesn’t change per the official blog, just the resolution improves.

This matters because it shows why the daily limit bites. Sixty credits a day sounds okay until you try to generate a 10-second clip with audio (120 credits). You can’t do it on day one without already spending paid credits.

🔍 AMPM exclusive check

The core issue: We can’t verify paid plan pricing from the official site because it doesn’t exist publicly. We pulled Standard (US$10/month), Pro (US$30/month), and Premium (US$60/month) from four independent third-party sources (atlascloud.ai, costbench.com, somake.ai, tooljunction.io), all consistent. But none of these numbers are first-hand from PixVerse. The vendor’s own blog confirms credits vary by account and region, meaning even they don’t publish fixed rates.

We also verified the free tier (90 credits on signup, 60 daily) against the same third-party consensus. All sources agree daily credits reset at UTC 00:00 and expire unused. No official documentation confirms this, and PixVerse’s blog explicitly dodges stating exact numbers.

This is not a gotcha we invented—it’s an obstacle the vendor created. Most SaaS tools hide pricing to drive sales calls; PixVerse hides it entirely. By comparison: second-hand data is better than no data, but it’s not the same as ringing up sales to confirm your tier actually works.

AMO, the budget-minded cat

☀️ AMO, the budget-minded cat

If you’re broke but want to try AI video, PixVerse’s free tier looks tempting. Ninety credits on signup, plus 60 more every day—that’s a non-zero amount of video you can make without paying. A 4-second clip with sound costs 48 credits. You could push out one short video daily, just barely.

But daily expiry is the sting. Credits don’t roll over to tomorrow. If you’re swamped on Tuesday, those 60 credits on Wednesday vanish at midnight UTC whether you use them or not. The tool won’t let you bank a week’s worth (420 credits) to save up for a bigger project. And the free tier comes with a watermark—visible branding on every output—plus resolution limits and personal-use-only restrictions. Want to publish a client project or sell a video? You can’t do it free.

The jump to paid is steep on a budget. Standard costs US$10/month and gives 1,200 credits—twenty times the daily free allowance. At 12 credits per second (audio), that’s 100 seconds of video monthly, or about three 30-second clips. If you’re cranking out more than one or two clips a week, US$10/month is probably cheaper than fighting the daily reset limit.

Year payment (US$8/month average) saves you US$24/year, which is two months free. It’s not transformative, but it’s there if you commit upfront.

PIMI, the performance-minded cat

🌙 PIMI, the performance-minded cat

For a creator who cares about output quality and throughput, the bottleneck isn’t price—it’s credits and resolution.

Pro (US$30/month, or US$24/month annual) jumps to 6,000 credits/month, unlocks 1080p, and lets you generate 5 videos in parallel. That’s 500 seconds of 1080p audio video monthly, or roughly sixteen 30-second clips. For a weekly content creator, this is the natural tier. The per-second rate is identical to Standard (same credit cost), but the volume and resolution both matter for a professional product.

If you’re publishing weekly or pushing more, Premium (US$60/month, or US$48/month annual) gives 15,000 credits/month and 8 parallel renders. That’s 1,250 seconds monthly—enough for a daily short-form video habit. Most of the cost jump is pure volume, not quality, but the parallel limit does matter: if three videos are rendering on Standard (3 parallel slots), a fourth queues and waits. Premium avoids that friction.

The real question is whether PixVerse’s quality justifies the tier. We didn’t test the outputs ourselves (AMPM doesn’t run video benchmarks), but third-party reviews peg PixVerse as mid-tier quality—better than most free tools, not quite matching Runway ML or HeyGen on coherence. If your audience cares about polish, the US$30–60 range is table stakes for any AI video tool. PixVerse isn’t cheaper, just average.

One plus: annual billing gives a 20% discount across all tiers. US$30/month (Pro) drops to US$24/month annualized. If you’ve tested PixVerse and like it, locking in annual is the smart move.

Verdict: who should use it, who should skip it

Use PixVerse if: You want to test AI video without a credit card, or you’re a casual creator who can work with 60 daily credits and don’t mind the watermark. The free tier won’t break the bank; it just won’t get you far.

Skip PixVerse if: You need predictable monthly costs or hate login walls. The hidden pricing and region-dependent quotas mean you can’t know your real limits until you sign up. And if commercial use matters (client work, brand videos), the free tier explicitly forbids it. Runway ML, Synthesia, or Pika Labs publish pricing upfront and don’t lock features behind the app—that alone makes them easier to budget around.

Pay for PixVerse if: You’ve tried it free and like the output, or you’re generating more than one clip weekly. Standard (US$10/month) pays for itself fast if you hit the daily limit. Pro (US$30/month) is the sweet spot for weekly creators. Anything beyond that, and you’re probably shopping at a different tier of tool.

The real cost of PixVerse is trust. You can’t validate pricing before committing. You can’t know if your region gets the same credits as someone else’s. The vendor relies on you trusting third-party forums and blog posts, which is fine for a free trial but uncomfortable if you’re paying monthly. Add watermark removal and commercial licensing on top of tier costs (prices unlisted), and you’re signing a blank check.


Written: 2026-09-23

Price last verified: 2026-09-08

Tool last health-checked: 2026-09-23

📎 Sources

All prices and quotas in this article come from AMPM’s verified dataset for PixVerse (last verified 2026-09-08); primary sources:

🐾 Meet the cats: AMO and PIMI

AMO and PIMI

AMPM is a Taiwan-based AI-tool pricing watchdog. Our motto: ask before you subscribe. Two cats argue every tool from two sides:

  • ☀️ AMO — the budget-minded cat. Always asks: is the free tier enough, and is paying actually worth it?
  • 🌙 PIMI — the performance-minded cat. Cares about whether it works well, fast, and gets your job done.

When they are done arguing, you know whether to pay. Every number is checked by us, with the verification date at the end.

🐾 Our sister sites also checked

Let's take a look at these

Go to the official website

Affiliate Links Notice